WHAT IS A NON-NORMIE?
A non-normie is an emotionally driven non-normal person.
|
The
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, called the
DSM-IV-TR, is the bible of psychologists and psychiatrists. It provides
the description and the basis for diagnosing virtually all mental disorders.
The only problem, however, is that the vast majority of the mental
disorders that are listed in the DSM-IV-TR are not mental disorders at
all. They are emotional disorders/diseases, for which there is no cure.
And non-normies are the only ones who suffer from emotional disorders.
Now, before we go any further, it is important that I simply define some terms that I' ll be using.
Drive and need:
These are two terms that are too often substituted for each other in
modern vocabulary. They are not synonyms. They are as different from
each other as alcohol is from water. Both are something to drink. There
the similarity ends. The desire to drink alcohol comes from a drive.
The yearning to consume water comes from a need.
Emotional Disorder/Disease: Emotionally abnormal
Mental Disorder/Disease: Mentally abnormal *
*This
Web/Blog site is not about the mentally abnormal. These victims of
nature or accident usually have wiring in the cerebellum that is more
disfigured than most. Normally they are identified as either
pathological (caused by disease) or organic (inherent). Also, the
terms "emotional disease" and "emotional disorder" are used
interchangeably because they have virtually the same "secondary
definition." |
What
we will be dealing with here is the first one, emotional disorders, and
they don' t show up on any electronic scope. We can only determine that
they exist by observing the person and determining that their actions
are not normal.
Alcoholism, for example, is an emotional disorder
that manifests itself in an obsession for a substance that alters the
alcoholic's perception of the emotional pain that he or she is
experiencing. (Also, there is a psychological filtering mechanism
involved in these diseased emotions, which I'll cover later.)
Have you noticed that when psychologists name certain obsessive types, they often use a word ending with "aholic"?
This includes such dysfunctions as workaholics, rageaholics,
sexaholics, foodaholics, exerciseaholics and even chocaholics. Why do
they do that? It' s because those other obsessions have the same basic obsessive characteristics as alcoholism.
What they don' t tell you is that they are really the same obsession
that is merely manifesting itself with a different coping mechanism.
The addict simply chooses different agents to alter the perception of
his or her emotions and reality.
Let's
say a non-normie man exposes himself to woman in public. He is arrested
and psychologically examined before his court date. The diagnosis is "exibitionist."
Instead of jail, the judge sentences him to a mental hospital where he
is given therapy. A year later, based upon supposedly a "successful"
treatment, he is placed on probation and released. He skips out and
moves to another state where he promptly goes into a department store,
takes some women's underwear into the changing room and proceeds to
masturbate. He is discovered by the clerk and arrested. Again he is
psychologically examined by the court and diagnosed as suffering from "fetishism."
He is sentenced to a mental hospital for therapy. Six months later he's
released on probation and skips out again. In another state he is
caught rubbing up against a woman he's standing next to on a subway
train. The judge has him examined and he' s diagnosed as suffering from
"frotteurism." After another term in a mental ward and
a period of therapy, he's released on probation. Off he goes to another
state where, from his hotel room, he spies with a telescope on a young
lady undressing in the adjacent building. He's spotted, arrested,
examined and diagnosed as being "voyeuristic."
Naturally,
since 9-11, the sharing of information between states would have
probably identified this man at the second arrest. But the point
remains. The court psychologist, in each state, diagnosed the subject
by the manifestation. All these were merely descriptions of the
different syndromes of the man. The correct diagnosis, the one they
missed, would be that of an emotionally driven non-normie
acting out his internal rage by various coping mechanisms like exposing
himself, getting off on women's undies, getting aroused by making
physical contact with a woman stranger and, then, by secretly observing
a woman taking her clothes off.
In other words,
all
emotional disorders produce only one type of person - the non-normie -
and the DSM-IV-TR is merely separating them by the manifestation, and
not identifying the type of person.
This
is where psychology has broken down severely. It has become a
profession built around cataloging manifestations (taxonomy), naming
the new syndromes and, then, treating each one as if it were something
different from the others. All syndromes simply emanate from a
non-normie choosing a different coping mechanism for his or her
emotional pain. It's nothing more than that, and nothing less. (See "What causes non-norminess," for more depth on that cause).
These
non-normie manifestations include (but are not limited to) alcoholism,
drug addiction, sex addiction, homosexuality, pornography obsession,
obsessive-compulsive disorders (including compulsive gambling) and
relationship obsession.
The way psychological diagnosis is
done now would be like the police department not recognizing that each
robbery call that they made was caused by criminals. Bank robberies
would require only an analysis of banks. Store robberies set off only
an investigation of stores. Muggings only meant studying people who had
been mugged. Never once, in all these cases, did the police consider
the obvious, to study the criminal mind and how it manifests itself in different types of crimes. Ridiculous you say. Not really when it comes to psychology.
Extreme non-normies number about fifteen percent of the population, yet they represent almost one-hundred percent of the severe emotional disorders.
Yet no psychological professional studies the non-normie. He doesn't
even exist in their manuals or classes. They study the disorder, which
is a code word for the manifestation, which is then listed as a new
syndrome.
This action is partially, Why psychology exacerbates non-normieness. I'll explain this further in the section titled by that name.
There
are only two sources of information in this world: One's own
experiences and the experiences of others. If you don't learn from the
experiences of others, you are doomed to learn from your own.
Non-normies
seldom learn from the experiences of others. They just learn from their
own experiences and only after they have tried every way possible to
make their way succeed. When alcoholics finally crawl into Alcoholics
Anonymous, asking for help, it happens after they've tried every way
possible to control their drinking. They beg for assistance when they
have absolutely given up (surrendered), which often takes a lifetime.
In
this web/blog site I am going to educate you about non-normies because,
whether you realize it or not, they are affecting your life every day,
and in ways that are always detrimental to you. And they are not just
alcoholics. They come in many different disguises,
performing many different dysfunctional behaviors, but they are all the
same person. And, unless you learn to recognize them, that adverse
affect will continue escalating and get worse.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident..."
Most
of the information on this web/blog site is based primarily upon
self-evident truth, like our Declaration of Independence was.
Self-evident truth is the best kind of truth. It's like Natural Law
which is also self-evident in nature and was placed on earth by God for
us to live by harmoniously.
Anyone can fill a book with
citations to prove almost anything they want to. After sixteen years in
Al-Anon (the sister program to Alcoholics Anonymous), three years
sponsoring hundreds of Alateens (the children of alcoholics), taking
courses and reading dozens of books on the subject, working as a lay
counselor for codependents, writing an instructional book and studying
DSM III, as well as DSM IV, I could, too. But, if there is no
self-evident truth to backup the statements, it will not stand alone
and few will believe what was said--except, of course, for those with a
pre-set agenda.
For fifteen of those sixteen years, I
dissected non-normie psyches and learned to understand them to the
depths of their innermost being. What you'll learn here is the result
of intensive personal research, compiled in boxes of material that was
reduced to a book. Then I wrote a novel about non-normies. Now, the web
site. I hope my time was not wasted because I'm depending on you, the normal person, to recognize it, to understand it and to act on it (for your future and mine).
|